Gutman v. Crawford
Opinion
Gary S. Gutman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his *927 state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Gutman v. Crawford, No. CA-02-388-2 (E.D.Va. July 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process,
DISMISSED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Gary S. GUTMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deborah CRAWFORD; John Kay Bancroft, Esquire, in His Individual Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished