U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Lanzy v. Harrison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 9, 2002 · Niemeyer, Williams, Traxler

51 F. App'x 921

Counsel

Lawrence Gene Lanzy, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Lanzy v. Warden Harrison (Supreme Court of the United States 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Gene Lanzy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lanzy has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Lanzy v. Harrison, No. CA-01-3652-24BH-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 25, *922 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We also deny Lanzy’s “Motion to Accept Exhibit Evidence.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.