Smith v. Glendening
Opinion
Bernard Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Smith has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Smith v. Glendening, No. CA-02-2071-L (D. Md. filed August 13, *275 2002, entered Aug. 14, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Bernard SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Parris N. GLENDENING, Governor, State of Maryland; Anthony Williams, Mayor, Washington DC; David Garraghty, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, Respondents-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished