Lucas v. Hutchinson
Opinion
Ezra Lucas seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lucas has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Lucas v. Hutchinson, No. CA-02-366-MJG (D.Md. July 31, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ezra LUCAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald HUTCHINSON, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections; J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished