Williams v. UPS

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Williams v. UPS

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1722

THADDEUS D. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-579)

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thaddeus D. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, Sara Lynne Berg, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Thaddeus D. Williams appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service, Inc.

on his claims arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court, as stated from the bench. See Williams v. United Parcel

Serv., Inc., No. CA-01-579 (E.D. Va. June 11, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished