Mooring v. East Carolina Univ

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mooring v. East Carolina Univ

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1911

LINWOOD E. MOORING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY; ROBBIE HUDSON, official capacity; EARNIE MARSHABURN, official capacity; JOE NORRIS, official capacity; WOODY BOLTON, official capacity; GLORIA SCHWARTZ, official capacity; PAULA HUTCHINSON, official capacity; ROGER NOBLES, official capacity; ARTHUR G. HOWELL, JR., official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-62-4-H(3))

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linwood E. Mooring, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oregon Lawton, III, Associate Attorney General, Celia Grasty Lata, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Linwood E. Mooring appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil rights claims under

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983

, 1985,

1986, 1988 (2000), his criminal conspiracy claims under

18 U.S.C. §§ 241

, 242 (2000), and his Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt

Organizations Act (RICO) claims under

18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1962

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Mooring v. East Carolina Univ., No. CA-02-62-4H(3) (E.D.N.C. Aug.

6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished