Mooring v. East Carolina Univ
Mooring v. East Carolina Univ
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1911
LINWOOD E. MOORING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY; ROBBIE HUDSON, official capacity; EARNIE MARSHABURN, official capacity; JOE NORRIS, official capacity; WOODY BOLTON, official capacity; GLORIA SCHWARTZ, official capacity; PAULA HUTCHINSON, official capacity; ROGER NOBLES, official capacity; ARTHUR G. HOWELL, JR., official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-62-4-H(3))
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linwood E. Mooring, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oregon Lawton, III, Associate Attorney General, Celia Grasty Lata, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Linwood E. Mooring appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights claims under
42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985,
1986, 1988 (2000), his criminal conspiracy claims under
18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242 (2000), and his Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO) claims under
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1962(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Mooring v. East Carolina Univ., No. CA-02-62-4H(3) (E.D.N.C. Aug.
6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished