Glendora v. Walker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 19, 2002

Glendora v. Walker, 53 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Glendora seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. See Glendora v. Walker, No. CA-02-471 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 13, 2002). We' dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name: GLENDORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John M. WALKER; Roseann B. MacKechne; Tynetta Hope; Helena M. Harris; Thomas F. Hogan; Denise Kelley; Kevin Smith; Joseph N. Alexander, Jr.; Colleen Kollar Kotelly; Nancy M. Mayer Whittington; Mary M. Schroeder; Cathy A. Catterson; Gwen Baptiste; Karen Murphy; Chief Clerk, Nassau Supreme Court; Motion Clerk; Intake Clerk; John P. D’Blasi; Barry Skwierski; Gerald Stern; Lee Kiklier; Albert Lawrence; New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct; City of New York; Department of Finance; Commissioner of Finance; Bureau of Parking Violations, Defendants-Appellees
Status: Unpublished