U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Purvis v. Social Security Admi

Purvis v. Social Security Admi
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 17, 2002

Purvis v. Social Security Admi

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1720

PAMELA S. PURVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-1052)

Submitted: November 8, 2002 Decided: December 17, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela S. Purvis, Appellant Pro Se. Maria Antonia Machin, Assistant Regional Counsel, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Pamela S. Purvis appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to uphold the Administrative Law Judge’s denial of her claim for Social Security disability benefits and Social Security income. We must uphold the decision to deny disability benefits if it is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996).

We have reviewed the administrative record, the district court’s order, and the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and the magistrate judge. Purvis v. Comm’r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CA-00-1052 (M.D.N.C. May 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.