United States v. Murray

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Murray, 53 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2002)
Luttig, Michael, Motz, Per Curiam

United States v. Murray

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Petition Unconstitutional Imposed Sentence Pursuant to Ring v. Arizona.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning stated by the district court. See United States v. Murray, No. CR-96-157 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 26, 2002 & entered Sept. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lenzie Lee MURRAY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished