Skundor v. Painter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Skundor v. Painter, 53 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2002)
Luttig, Michael, Motz, Per Curiam

Skundor v. Painter

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Skundor appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Skundor v. Painter, No. CA-00 — 463 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
David SKUNDOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER; Rick Nottingham, Captain, QII Unit Commander; James Rubenstein, Commissioner of the West Virginia Division of Corrections, in His Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished