Cockerill v. Darius

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Cockerill v. Darius, 53 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2002)
Luttig, Michael, Motz, Per Curiam

Cockerill v. Darius

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Newton Cockerill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cockerill v. Darius, No. CA-02-119-5-FO (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Newton COCKERILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W.F. DARIUS, Jr., Respondent-Appellee
Status
Unpublished