Anthony v. US Attorney General
Anthony v. US Attorney General
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2168
SAM ANTHONY, a/k/a Bennie L. Outlaw,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; UNITED STATES AMERICAN GOVERNMENT; DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 02-2169
SAM ANTHONY, a/k/a Bennie L. Outlaw,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; UNITED STATES AMERICAN GOVERNMENT; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION,
Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge; F. B. Stillman, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-626, CA-02-627)
Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 30, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sam Anthony, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
Sam Anthony filed notices of appeal in each of two actions he
had pending in the district court. However, the district court had
not yet entered orders in either of the cases. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541(1949). Because no order had been
entered—much less a final order or an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order—we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished