Brooks v. Johnson
Brooks v. Johnson
26 F. App'x 370
Brooks v. Johnson
Opinion of the Court
Charles E. Brooks appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Brooks contends that the district court erred in finding defendant Lloyd Albert Johnson, a Maryland Assistant State’s Attorney, was entitled to qualified immunity. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion show the district court correctly found Johnson was entitled to qualified immunity. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Brooks’ civil action.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.