Arnold v. Mades
Opinion of the Court
James Guy Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition in these consolidated cases. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Arnold v. Mades, Nos. CA-01-2347-AMD & CA-01-3087-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 2 & 6, 2001 and filed Nov. 27; entered Nov. 29, 2001). We deny Arnold’s motion for emergency action in No. 01-7964 and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James Guy ARNOLD v. Sheriff MADES Martin Van Evans, Lieutenant, Warden, Respondents-Appellees James Guy Arnold v. Charles Mades Martin Van Evans Washington County Sheriff's Department Attorney General for the State of Maryland M. Kenneth Long
- Status
- Published