United States v. Lozano

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Lozano, 30 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2002)

United States v. Lozano

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Jose Antonio Lozano appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for a transcript and for application of a specific statute. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
United States v. Jose Antonio LOZANO, Claimant-Appellant, and Property, 3714 Cancun Loop, Webb County, Laredo, Texas, with all Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon v. Hill Top Farm, Limited, a Texas limited partnership
Status
Published