Jara C. Uzenda seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Uzenda’s motion for leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Uzenda v. Stroman, No. CA-01-2212-4-22 (D.S.C. June 25, 2001; Oct. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.