U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Banton v. Angelone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 23, 2002 · Michael, Motz, Niemeyer

35 F. App'x 102

Counsel

Richard Kevin Banton, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Cady v. Ride-Away Handicap Equipment Corp. (4th Cir. 2017)
Deborah Hickerson v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. (4th Cir. 2018)
Eplus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Richard Kevin Banton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Banton v. Angelone, No. CA-01-402-7 (W.D.Va. Jan 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.