U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Ross v. Pendell

Ross v. Pendell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 5, 2002
46 F. App'x 155

Ross v. Pendell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Leroy Ross appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ross v. Pendell, No. CA-00-182 (E.D.Va. Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.