Christopher Andaryl Wills seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Wills has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Wills, Nos. CR-99-52-S; CA-02-119-S (D.Md. Jan. 14, 2002). Accordingly, we *704deny Wills’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.