Roberts v. Rubenstein

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Roberts v. Rubenstein, 47 F. App'x 666 (4th Cir. 2002)

Roberts v. Rubenstein

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Craig R. Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Rubenstein, No. CA-01-281-2 (S.D.W.Va. May 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Craig R. ROBERTS v. Jim RUBENSTEIN William S. Haines Roy White, and Correctional Medical Services (CMS) West Virginia Department of Corrections Huttonsville Correctional Center, Individually and in their official capacities
Status
Published