Johnson v. City of Chesapeake
Opinion of the Court
Veronica Moody Johnson and Christopher Lee Johnson appeal the district court’s orders: (1) granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss in part; and (2) granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. City of Chesapeake, No. CA-99-736-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2001 & March 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Veronica Moody JOHNSON Christopher Lee Johnson v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, A Municipal Corporation, Itself City Council of the City of Chesapeake, Virginia, in its official capacity William E. Ward Dalton S. Edge John A. Cosgrove John M. De Triquet Alan P. Krasnoff Dwight M. Parker William H. Pierce Gene A. Waters Debbie Ritter, In their individual and official capacities as members of the City Council of the City of Chesapeake, Virginia Planning Commission of the City of Chesapeake, Virginia, In its official capacity Rodney L. Foster, In his individual and official capacity as a member of the Planning Commission of the City of Chesapeake Clifton D. Cabarras, In his official capacity as a member of the Planning Commission of the City of Chesapeake, Virginia Edward L. Hall, In his official capacity as a member of the Planning Commission of the City of Chesapeake, Virginia Frankie W. Carroll Bryan L. Collins Sanny S. Davenport Larry W. Radford Gladys A. Wilfore Thomas T. Winborne, In their individual and official capacities as members of the Planning Commission of the City of Chesapeake, Virginia
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published