U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Johnson v. City of Chesapeake

Johnson v. City of Chesapeake
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 7, 2002 · Motz, Traxler, Wilkins
50 F. App'x 608

Counsel

Veronica Moody Johnson, Christopher Lee Johnson, Appellants Pro Se. Thomas Jeffrey Salb, Darlene Paige Bradberry, Breeden, Salb, Beasley & Duvall, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Johnson v. City of Chesapeake

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Veronica Moody Johnson and Christopher Lee Johnson appeal the district court’s orders: (1) granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss in part; and (2) granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. City of Chesapeake, No. CA-99-736-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2001 & March 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.