U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Mulazim v. Angelone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 14, 2002 · Hamilton, Luttig, Wilkins

50 F. App'x 635

Counsel

Ahoto Taysir Mulazim, Appellant Pro Se.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Mulazim, AKA Carpenter v. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections (Supreme Court of the United States 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Ahoto Taysir Mulazim appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). Because Mulazim may cure any deficiency by filing an amended complaint, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the judgment is not a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.