Hinton v. Gilchrist

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 2, 2002

Hinton v. Gilchrist, 51 F. App'x 426 (4th Cir. 2002)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hinton v. Gilchrist, No. CA-00-246-3-3-MU (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2000). Loren Henderson’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for the appointment of counsel at the Government’s expense are denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Charles E. HINTON Rakim Waliyy Shakur Frank Robinson, Jr. Sheldon Collins, Vann Song Kevin McGill David Stanley Johnny L. Burris Tymone Nelson Demetrius Dixon Carlos J. Weathers Darrell L. Perry James H. Evans Byron L. Jackson Kurtis S. Benjamin Loren Henderson v. Peter S. GILCHRIST, III Jane Doe, Superior Court Clerk John Doe, District Court Judge, Court Room 1101, on 3/14/00 Isabel Scott Day, Public Defender, District 26 Kevin P. Tully, Assistant Public Defender Marc S. Gentile, Assistant Public Defender Gay R. Atkins, Attorney at Law, Assistant Public Defender Alicia Brooks, Attorney at Law, Assistant Public Defender Sharon Jumper, Attorney at Law, Assistant Public Defender Jean Lawson, Attorney at Law, Assistant Public Defender Stephanie Jordan, Attorney at Law, Assistant Public Defender John Totten, Attorney at Law, Assistant Public Defender Gregory L. Woods, Assistant Public Defender Jim Pendergraph, Sheriff Haakon Thorsen, Attorney at Law, Assistant Public Defender Charles Morgan, Jr., Attorney at Law, Assistant Public Defender
Status: Published