Sa'id v. Best Buy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Sa'id v. Best Buy, 53 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2002)
Sa'id v. Best Buy
Opinion of the Court
Mustafa H. Sa‘id appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for “disposition of elaim/judgment based on jurisdiction amount to be paid to the plaintiff by the defendant’s.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Best Buy’s motion for sanctions and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sa‘id v. Best Buy, No. CA-01-677-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mustafa H. SA'ID v. BEST BUY, and Fairfax County Government Center County of Fairfax Police Department D.A. Crooke, Sergeant, Individually J. Thomas Manger, Colonel, Individually Eric Hante, Officer, Individually Brian J. McAndrew, Lieutenant, Individually Leon G. Williams, Major, Individually Thomas Ryan, Captain, Individually Arthur J. Hurlock, Jr., Individually Thomas E. Tyman, Individually Charles K. Peters, Captain, Individually Williams Audrey M. Slyman, Major, Individually Commonwealth of Virginia, Workers Compensation Commissioners Susan A. Cummins, Individually
- Status
- Published