Myers v. Hughes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Myers v. Hughes, 53 F. App'x 696 (4th Cir. 2003)
King, Per Curiam, Traxler, Wilkins

Myers v. Hughes

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Steven Myers, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his *697 petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Myers has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Myers v. Hughes, No. CA-01-88-HC-BR (E.D.N.C. May 20, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mark Steven MYERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marcus HUGHES, Respondent-Appellee
Status
Unpublished