U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Goist v. US Bureau of Prisons

Goist v. US Bureau of Prisons
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 7, 2003

Goist v. US Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7653

PAUL B. GOIST, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE; STATUTORY AGENT OFFICERS; DAN DOVE, Warden of Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-2211-0-20-BD)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 7, 2003

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul B. Goist, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Paul B. Goist, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his petition that it construed as filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goist v. United States Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-02- 2211-0-20-BD (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.