Diaz v. Baan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Diaz v. Baan, 54 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2003)

Diaz v. Baan

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Diaz appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Diaz v. Baan, No. CA-01-263-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 26, 2002 & entered Sept. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Pedro DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor “John Doe” BAAN; George Wilkes; Barbara Knight; Hope Harrison, Defendants-Appellees, and North Carolina Department of Corrections Utilization Review Board, Defendant
Status
Unpublished