Baker v. District of Columbia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Baker v. District of Columbia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7665

TODD EMERSON BAKER,

Plaintiff Appellant,

versus

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; KATHLEEN HAWK- SAWYER, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; J. OATES, Hospital Administrator; DOCTOR GAY, Medical Administrator; DR. LAYBOURN, Institution Physician; NURSE MALONEY, Medical Staff; J. CAPPS, Institution Ombudsman; M. INMAN, RN, Medical Staff Supervisor; DR. BRADLY; SUPERVISOR BLOWE; V. HUNT, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-472-2)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 7, 2003

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Todd Emerson Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Heather Marie Kofron, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Todd Emerson Baker appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Baker v. District of

Columbia, No. CA-01-472-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 27, 2002 & entered

Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished