Husketh v. Beck

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Husketh v. Beck, 55 F. App'x 157 (4th Cir. 2003)

Husketh v. Beck

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Lee Husketh appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Husketh v. Beck, No. CA-02-583-5 BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2002). We deny Husketh’s “motion requesting this court to direct the Department of Corrections to tax Plaintiffs trust fund for cost of suit.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *158 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Douglas Lee HUSKETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; Michael S. Hamden, Defendants-Appellees
Cited By
1 case
Status
Unpublished