U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Brooks v. State of MD

Brooks v. State of MD
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 24, 2003

Brooks v. State of MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7568

ALEC RODNEY BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

STATE OF MARYLAND, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; WILLIAM W.

SONDERVAN, Commissioner, in his official and individual capacity; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS; ELIAS LAKEW, M.D., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02- 494-MJG)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 24, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alec Rodney Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, George Eugene Brown, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Alec Rodney Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brooks v. Maryland, No. CA-02-494-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.