U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Windsor v. Amrien

Windsor v. Amrien
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2003

Windsor v. Amrien

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7423

TERRY MILTON WINDSOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DONALD J. AMRIEN, Medical Doctor; KAREN CRIM, Sergeant, Accomack County Jail; GRETTA SAMPLE, Nurse, Accomack County Jail, Defendants - Appellees, and

ROBERT CROCKETT, Sheriff, Accomack County Jail; MIKE DABRASKI, Correctional Officer, Accomack County Jail; DEPUTY GOGA, Accomack County Jail; ACCOMACK COUNTY JAIL, Medical/Officer, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-01-799)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 23, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Milton Windsor, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Hartnett, AYRES & HARTNETT, Accomac, Virginia; Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Terry Milton Windsor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Windsor v. Amrien, No. CA-01-799 (E.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2002). In addition, we find that Windsor’s complaints regarding the timeliness of the filing of Defendants’ pleadings are unfounded. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.