United States v. Highsmith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Highsmith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-4520

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRY LEON HIGHSMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-01-63-F)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Terry Leon Highsmith appeals his 180-month sentence imposed

pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act,

18 U.S.C. § 924

(e)

(2000), for a violation of

18 U.S.C. § 922

(g)(1) (2000).

Highsmith’s sole argument on appeal is that the district court

erred in sentencing him as an armed career criminal because the

predicate convictions were not alleged in the indictment. We have

reviewed the record and find this appeal foreclosed by our decision

in United States v. Sterling,

283 F.3d 216

(4th Cir.), cert.

denied,

122 S. Ct. 2606

(2002). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished