Mauldin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
Alfred Lee Mauldin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying *149 relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mauldin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, CA-02-336-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2002). We deny Maul-din’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Alfred Lee MAULDIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; Mary Ellen Thomas, Warden, Butner, North Carolina; Joseph Tang, Staff Attorney; Lieutenant Yonce; Lieutenant Wenzler; Cardinal White, SRO Unit Manager, Respondents-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished