Omolewa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Omolewa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 56 F. App'x 129 (4th Cir. 2003)

Omolewa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jobson O. Omolewa seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2002); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny Omolewa’s petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Omolewa, No. A28-290-039 (B.I.A. June 17, 2002). We deny Omolewa’s motion for stay of removal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Reference

Full Case Name
Jobson O. OMOLEWA, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General, Respondents
Status
Unpublished