U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Barber

United States v. Barber
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 27, 2003 · Williams, King, Gregory
55 F. App'x 175

Counsel

Mawami Barber, Appellant Pro Se. James Harry Green, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

United States v. Barber

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mawami Barber seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Barber has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Barber, Nos. CR-00-429; CA-02-1436 (D.Md. Oct. 30, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.