Foster v. Painter
Opinion
Hartzel Ray Foster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Foster v. Painter, No. CA-99-48-2 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Hartzel Ray FOSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished