Foster v. Painter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Foster v. Painter, 55 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2003)

Foster v. Painter

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hartzel Ray Foster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Foster v. Painter, No. CA-99-48-2 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hartzel Ray FOSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Status
Unpublished