U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Foster v. Painter

Foster v. Painter
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 27, 2003 · Williams, King, Gregory
55 F. App'x 172

Foster v. Painter

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hartzel Ray Foster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Foster v. Painter, No. CA-99-48-2 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.