Bilal v. Carroll
Bilal v. Carroll
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7679
SHATEEK AMIN BILAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID CARROLL; THOMAS AKER; DENNIS VANBUREN; ALBERT PRADO; WILLIAM WESLEY; TONY JONES; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CHAPPELL; CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION DUNKLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-287-5-BO)
Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 27, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shateek Amin Bilal, Appellant Pro Se. Mary S. Mercer, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Shateek Amin Bilal appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint without prejudice
for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Bilal v. Carroll, No.
CA-02-287-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished