Preston West appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of an order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. West, No. CR-97-175 (D.Md. July 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *210 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.