Albert Manning Scott, Sr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on Scott’s motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Scott, No. CR-89-186 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.