U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft

Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 5, 2003

Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft

Opinion

FILED: February 4, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1116 (CA-02-2739-JFM, CA-00-1332-MDL)

In Re: MICROSOFT CORPORATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Defendant - Appellant.

WILDTANGENT, INCORPORATED, Amicus Supporting Appellant.

CORRECTED ORDER

Appellant has filed motions for stay pending appeal, to expedite appeal, and to file a deferred appendix. Appellee has filed a response in opposition to the motion for stay pending appeal, and a response consenting to the motion to expedite and to file a deferred appendix.

Potential intervenor, WildTangent, Inc., has filed a motion for leave to intervene, consented to by appellant. Appellee filed a response in opposition.

The Court grants the motions for stay, to expedite, and to file a deferred appendix. The Court denies the motion for leave to intervene; however, the papers filed by WildTangent, Inc., will be accepted as a brief amicus curiae.

Entered at the direction of Judge Gregory with the concurrence of Judge Widener and Judge Niemeyer.

For the Court,

/s/ Patricia S. Connor CLERK

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.