Simpson v. Lovitt
Opinion
Mark G. Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Simpson v. Lovitt, No. CA-02-1465-AM (E.D.Va. Oct. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mark G. SIMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy LOVITT; Deputy Gwaltney; James H. Dunning, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished