Henson v. Angelone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Henson v. Angelone, 55 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2003)

Henson v. Angelone

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Henson, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting his motion to supplement the record in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition but denying further relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Henson v. Angelone, No. CA-01-59 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
George HENSON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Status
Unpublished