U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Henson v. Angelone

Henson v. Angelone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 5, 2003 · Widener, Niemeyer, Traxler
55 F. App'x 213

Henson v. Angelone

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Henson, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting his motion to supplement the record in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition but denying further relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Henson v. Angelone, No. CA-01-59 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.