Whitaker v. Titmus Optical Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Whitaker v. Titmus Optical Inc., 55 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2003)
Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Traxler, Widener

Whitaker v. Titmus Optical Inc.

Opinion

*202 PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Lee Whitaker appeals from the district court’s order denying relief in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Whitaker v. Titmus Optical Inc., No. CA-02-96-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Cynthia Lee WHITAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TITMUS OPTICAL INC., Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished