United States v. Corona
United States v. Corona
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERTO GIL CORONA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-99-307, CA-01-1421)
Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: February 3, 2003
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roberto Gil Corona, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Roberto Gil Corona seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal based upon the district
court’s reasoning that Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466(2000),
is not retroactively applicable on collateral review under United
States v. Sanders,
247 F.3d 139(4th Cir.), cert. denied,
122 S. Ct. 573(2001). See United States v. Corona, Nos. CR-99-307; CA-
01-1421 (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished