Studwell v. Chief Warden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Studwell v. Chief Warden, 55 F. App'x 712 (4th Cir. 2003)
Michael, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wilkins

Studwell v. Chief Warden

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Studwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Studwell v. Chief Warden, No. CA-02-298 (E.D.Va. Dec. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Kenneth STUDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHIEF WARDEN; Page Tunr; Unit Wilmouth; Counselor McLauran; Dr. Holaran, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished