Mabine v. Ambrogi

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Mabine v. Ambrogi, 55 F. App'x 706 (4th Cir. 2003)
Michael, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wilkins

Mabine v. Ambrogi

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sidney Mabine appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mabine v. Ambrogi, No. CA-02-1061 (W.D.Va. Oct. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sidney MABINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lawrence AMBROGI, Commonwealth’s Attorney; Luke Boyd, Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished