Johnson v. Flannery

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Johnson v. Flannery, 55 F. App'x 702 (4th Cir. 2003)
Michael, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wilkins

Johnson v. Flannery

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint, which the court properly construed as an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Flannery, No. CA-02-294-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Wayne JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sara E. FLANNERY, Administrative Agent; Richard L. Williams, Administrative Minister; Youngblood, DEA Agent; William B. England, Drug Investigator; Larry A. Loveless, Drug Task Force; Randy Belyen, U.S. Marshall; John Walsh, DEA; Lisa D. Somer, DEA; Robert Valentine, DEA, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished